Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2016-04-17 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2016-04-17 House Journal Page 2504 HB 126 Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the House consider the Senate message (page 2498) on the following: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 126(JUD) am "An Act relating to the administration of military justice; relating to the adoption of regulations by the adjutant general; relating to the authority of the adjutant general; relating to appeals of convictions and sentences of courts-martial; establishing the Military Appeals Commission; relating to the detention and incarceration of members of the militia; relating to the jurisdiction 2016-04-17 House Journal Page 2505 of the supreme court over petitions from the Military Appeals Commission; relating to involuntary commitment for evaluation or treatment of a mental disease or defect before court-martial proceedings; relating to offenses subject to court-martial proceedings; amending Rule 6, Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." and SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 126(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Millett moved that the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 126(JUD) am, thus adopting SCS CSHB 126(JUD), and recommended that the members vote yes. The question being: "Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment to CSHB 126(JUD) am?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 126(JUD) Concur YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara, Gattis, Guttenberg, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool Excused: Hawker And so, the House concurred in the Senate amendment. Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2016-04-17 House Journal Page 2506 Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Chief Clerk notified the Senate. SCS CSHB 126(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for enrollment.